Measurement
[1. Appearance ]
Earmax ER600
• Knowles 60500 Dual BA (Custom-built)
• Looks almost the same as Apple in-ear ME186
• ControlTalk for iOS
• $29 USD
Earmax ER600 Measurement
[2. Frequency Response ]
Uncompensated
Diffuse Field Target Compensated
Olive Welti Target Compensated
CSD - Olive Welti Target Compensated
[3. Square Wave ]
• 300Hz
• 30Hz
[4. Minimum Phase ]
[5. Harmonic Distortions ]
• 94dB SPL @500Hz
[6. Impedance ]
DC Ohm
Black: Impedance Magnitude
Green: Electrical Phase
[7. Resistor Added ]
Uncompensated
Black : 0 ohm
Pink : 10 ohm
Blue : 30 ohm
Orange: 90 ohm
Green: 300 ohm
Resistor added
Difference
Blue(flat): 0 ohm
Orange: 10 ohm
Pink : 90 ohm
Green: 300 ohm
Resistor added
[8. ER600 + resistor ]
Diffuse Field Target Compensated
• 300 ohm resistor added
Olive Welti Target Compensated
• Red: 30 ohm resistor added
Olive Welti Target Compensated
• 90 ohm resistor added
Olive Welti Target Compensated
• Black: 0 ohm
• Orange: 10 ohm
• Green: 90 ohm
Resistor added
One of the least musically involving iem's I've ever used. I respect it way more than I like it. Maybe Apple is dumping their inventory and trying something new. Let's pray.
ReplyDeletePreviously I heard the unofficial news that apple is making a BT IEM called AirPod. lol
DeleteHa! Good point.
DeleteI should also add that I tried a 250ohm resistor
ReplyDeleteDue to insufficient volume, I recommend you to use resistor under 90 ohms.
DeleteActually, I started with an ER4P to S converter which I think is around 75ohms before doing the 250. I ended up giving them to my wife for pink noise sleep phones. She loves them. They made me want to sleep too!
ReplyDeleteI'm sure that that is the best combination.
DeleteReally nice blog - and measurements! I hope one day you can do a measurement on the JVC HA-SZ2000. It exists in two versions: the 16 Ohm asian one (Live Beat), and the 24 Ohm european one (Z-Series). That one seems to have the same drivers, but has added resistors and one capacitor (sort of crossover network). The measurements found online so far are contrradicting and confusing. With your measurment of the DTX350 you got it 100% right, so I hope to see the JVC here too!
ReplyDeleteI see. Didn't know that there are two versions. I'll do that if I have a chance.
DeleteThanks. JVC is not keen to publish the differences, although they are obvious after some research (for example the impedance difference). I have both models, opened them and therefore know exactly. There is no big difference in sound or sensitivity, so the question is why did JVC do this? Unfortunately that is a typical japanese company, so we will never know, it seems. The -E version has a serious resistor of 20 Ohms in front of the bass driver, while the Mid/Hi driver is fed from 12 Ohm and 4.7 ยต in parallel. It looks like they wanted to reduce the middle frequency range a bit this way. But IMHO that didn't work out as expected, because the biggest fail in this phone is that the Mid/Hi driver lies directly on your ears. And sounds aweful because of that. Moving the driver away a few mm, by adding a spacer under the pads, or using the often recommended HM5 pads, the sound already changes significantly - the mids become far less aweful. I modded both versions with spacers and further reduce the mids by 4 dB via EQ (I like V shape sound), and they sound quite nice that way.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the instructive info!
DeleteCan you measure the effect of air bent of ADDIEM? I always wondered about why there is duct on it while it uses BA. Will it be any difference if the bent is blocked?
ReplyDeleteJust tried, and it seem that blocking the vent does not affects a significant result. I wonder why they made a vent, too.
DeleteMeasurement: http://i.imgur.com/ejSb6Pr.png
Thanks for the measuring about vent effect. Can you measure the effect of metal damper, too? Is it work as an acoustic damper or just a dust cap?
ReplyDeletehttp://clarityfidelity.blogspot.com/2014/12/apple-in-ear-me186-measurement.html
DeleteHere, you can find out the effect of stock metal damper of ADDIEM. As you can see, it involves the acoustic functions.
I have seen you have measurements on both earmax ER600 and Apple in ear. Is it absolutely same? Measurements are more or less the same. But how about sound presentation, clarity, details?
ReplyDeleteThey're 99% same. No one can't distinguish them with sound, I guess.
DeleteBut there are QC problems for ER600, so you should be careful not to buy a malfunctioned pair.
Delete