Measurement
DBA Technology
OPUS 1 uses one custom-made full-range 'Dynamic BA' driver in each earpiece fitted to an ergonomic housing.
This 'Dynamic Balanced Armature' is made by their own technology.
U.V coated housing
Perfect fit by ergonomic design
-
Wavelet Design OPUS1 Measurement
Raw
Diffuse Field Target Compensated
Olive Welti Target Compensated
CSD
Harmonic Distortions
94 dB @ 500 Hz
Distortions over 1% below 1kHz
They explained that the DBA performs low distortion sound by using their custom made BA.
Actually as shown in the measurement data, DBA's distortions are quite high, compared to other conventional BA earphones.
Impedance magnitude
Effect of adding a resistor
Black : 0 ohm
Orange: 10 ohm
Blue : 30 ohm
Green: 90 ohm
Pink : 300 ohm
Insertion depth
• Black:4.8 mm
• Green: 6.8 mm
• Red : 8.8 mm
Away from the reference plane
Difference between OPUS1 and ER-4P
• Black: Wavelet Design OPUS1
• Pink: Etymotic Research ER-4P
THD - 94dB SPL @ 500Hz
• 1.2% at 713.6Hz
THD - 100dB SPL @ 500Hz
• 2.7% at 713.6Hz
They also explained that this DBA works stable at the high output.
However, as the same problem occurs in the conventional BA, its distortion also increases at high volume.
Resistor added
Diffuse Field Target Compensated
• 90 ohms resistor added
-
Wavelet Design uploads measurement data on their own blog.
http://blog.naver.com/waveletd
According to their data, differences among each units are quite big(Almost 10 dB).
If the magnetic poles are arranged so that they are the extremes of the armature motion, wouldn't the force factor be even more non-linear than in the normal balanced armature?
ReplyDeleteImpressive bandwidth for a single armature anyway. A shame about the inconsistent high frequency response and the distortion.
Maybe. Their claims were not real, anyway.
DeleteBandwidth was quite impressive to me, too. They said that this is because of the weight of their BA was 30% lighter, compared to conventional BA.
->
http://blog.naver.com/waveletd/220338296843
http://zionote.com/blog/?p=3854