Pages

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Etymotic Research ER4SR (IEM)

Measurements


Etymotic Research ER4SR (*Studio Reference)

• Single BA (Knowles RAB)
• Detachable custom MMCX cable
• Green acoustic damper
• US $ 349 [MSRP]


Etymotic Research ER4SR measurements

Check the Measurement Procedures first.

[1. Frequency Response ]
Uncompensated


Diffuse Field Target Compensated


Harman Target Compensated


CSD



[2. Square Wave ]
30 Hz

300 Hz



[3. Minimum Phase ]



[4. Harmonic Distortions ]
94dB SPL @ 500 Hz



[5. Impedance ]
Black: Impedance Magnitude
Green: Electrical Phase



[6. Eartips ]

Uncompensated

Black: ER38-18CL
Orange: ER38-14F


Uncompensated

Black: ER38-18CL
Orange: ER38-17


Uncompensated

Black: ER38-18CL
Orange: ER38-15SM



[7. Insertion Depth ]
Uncompensated

Orange: -1 mm
Black: 0 (General)
Green: 2 mm
Away from the reference plane



[8. Added resistor ]
Uncompensated

Black: 0 ohm
Orange: 140 ohms
Resistor



[9. Acoustic dampers ]

Uncompensated

• Black: No damper



• Black: No damper



[10. Comparison ]


Uncompensated

Etymotic Research
• Black: ER4SR
• Orange: ER-4S



Uncompensated

Etymotic Research
Black: ER4SR
Orange: ER-4P





23 comments:

  1. Stunning. Time to start saving up!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Greatly improved on outer design.

      Delete
    2. After snapping the ear stem on a pair, I didn't trust it any more. It's about time they went with a metal body. The detachable cord is also a huge plus.

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the review. It would be nice to see the measurement of ER4XR as well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent set of measurements once again.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So Looks like no big improvements. They didn't improve the distortion or bandwidth. XR is more interesting but the distortion numbers should be about the same. The biggest improvement is the shell design

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, metal housing looks quite classy.

      Delete
    2. Distortion is higher on the XR --- it's a vented BA. Ety tolerates up to 2% distortion for the XR on 200 mV drive.

      Delete
  5. Excellent but I wish the drivers had tighter matching in the sub-bass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. As far as I know, Etymotic conducts the quality control(QC) in 100 Hz ~ 10kHz.

      Delete
  6. The distortion of xr is 0.7-0.9% and bass is twice as much as er4s. Added a resistor which helps a lot of the high end.

    ReplyDelete
  7. this is definitely helping me decide if i should upgrade my ER4s now. Thanks :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Your graph matches exactly what I hear. I have an eq based on your Harman compensated graph that really neutralizes these, but would you mind posting an eq setting that we can verify by your graphs neutralizes them truly accurately?? I am making an analogue filter and this would be so helpful. Just a three or four point setting to fix the biggest issues?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hello there, do you know the distance between the driver and the damper?
    Also what is the resistor value used in it?
    Thank you :))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know the distance between the driver and the damper, but the resistance of acoustic dampers are 1,500 Ohms.

      Delete
  10. Hello there, i've been looking at your graphs for some time and it's a wealth of information.

    For ER4SR, i'm wondering how you can achieve that graph with triple flange clear while Crinacle and Accufidelity looks different than yours.

    When doing sine sweeps with my ears using the triple flange clear, your graph looks like what i hear when doing sine sweep. I wonder what caused the discrepancy? Did you do any modification to your rig?

    Cheers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I didn't do any modification to the rig. Perhaps that discrepancy is due to the nozzle insertion depth.

      Delete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete